However, if you're a fan of lavender and tonka, it might be worth sampling to see if it works better for you. Either the remaining accords are too volatile or they aren't used in a great enough concentration to back up the strong statement the fragrance makes at its start. I have worn it a few times and was trying to figure out if I liked it when my wife very pointedly asked me what perfume I was wearing.

If you over-apply (and that`s what a lots of people do, hoodwinkled by a a fresh lemony scent from the bottle), you will never, ever experience no cloves, no nutmeg and absolutely no woody base. This stuff is really, really good, much better than I thought it would be, my benchmark for Jacques Bogart being One Man Show, a cologne I do not particularly like. Wearing Bogart now feels like I'm getting plucked out of time, not just to the 80's but to any time period before the internet, smartphones, and now, the advent of AI. Featuring dominant top notes and a light lingering scent, this eau de toilette is the ideal skin freshener.Well this one as it shows has no sweet notes except oakmoss and birch (but wich are distinctive with no doubt, you can smell them) All others, are by taste or smell bitter as this fragrance is! Just a little bit sweet lemon at first, then cloves-levander-juniper and finally oakmoss, birch and a touch of leather. men had briefcases, mobile phones were huge, fountain pens were still a thing (check the packaging). Paco Rabanne pour homme is green, creamy with a touch of powder and a good whiff of lavender and fresher.

With the slogan “I create only for men” at its heart, the Jacques Bogart line has gained impressive popularity due to its emphasis on crafting scents that provide a distinctly masculine elegance. The interest that causes the pleasure that it gives us when using it, Jacques Bogart Pour Homme marks the regret of many of us who do not know or are unwilling to enjoy it. Bogart is stronger, denser, and more mature-smelling than Shock, which is a bit muskier and more fleeting, more candied, more whimsical. I see a lot of people saying they get a strong Cherry tobacco fragrance in this, I personally don't.

But also I've learned that I simply don't like sweet vanilla/tonka drydowns in this type of fragrance. The first notes I can pick up is the clean fresh scent combined with a spicy scent from nutmeg, cloves mixed with the aroma of leather.

Not an office scent, unless you’re the boss and don’t have to care or maybe you have a need to intimidate in a business situation or similar. It's still got a strongly green and spiced opening, but space has been made for the other notes and elements of the scent to shine. Wouldn't say outdated, easily worn on a brisk fall day by anybody 30+ with a hankering for old school vibes. I always considered Aramis to be the torch bearer of good quality affordable fragrances that are reformulated well. It is a magnificent example where a balanced blend of a handful of notes creates an entirely new and unified olfactory impression.

if you ever had 'one man show', well that one is also noticeble in this one of course BUT this one is softer, greener,soapier, smoother, much better. Intermediate explanation: I actually like to make a bow around all these "Homme" fragrances, they are namely like trimmed to inconspicuousness, to what many men imagine under men's fragrances. Classic fougere : lavender, oakmoss and tonka bean but with a fruity, creamy ( sandalwood and vanilla) twist in the mid. i know it's almost a blasphemy, but i think this one is even better than the so much loved paco rabanne.