For a lens with such a modest maximum aperture, the levels of light falloff towards the corners are a little disappointing. At 150mm and f/5 the corners are 1.6 stops darker than the image centre and this level of vignetting is pretty much constant throughout the zoom range. To achieve even illumination, the lens needs to be stopped down to f/11. The Sigma 150-600mm f5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports is a long telephoto zoom designed for full-frame mirrorless cameras with Sony E and Leica L-mounts. Announced in July 2021, it complements Sigma’s 100-400mm f5-6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary for those who need more reach. Sometimes I need more than 300mm. Wanted to wait for a new Nikon telezoom but needed something now. SLR Gear didn't have any test results to help my decision, but I bought one anyway. I ran the RAW files through my typical DxOMark OpticsPro settings, then through CS6 and Nik. Overall, I found that I had to add quite a few more adjustments to the Sigma files than with the Tamron produced files. Typically this included more Gamma adjustment, vibrance, and contrast as well as a host of other ‘tweaks’ that were image specific. The Sigma files also needed more sharpening, especially when shot at the longer end of the focal range. I found that I had to spend quite a bit more time working with the Sigma files than with the Tamron-produced ones…easily double. NIKON D800 @ 270mm, ISO 1600, 1/3200, f/5.6 At 150mm vignetting is negligible if the lens is stopped down to f11, but at 500mm the corners are darker even with the lens stopped down to f11.

Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Interchangeable Lens Review

Although this lens isn't one of Sigma's EX series, they don't appear to have cut any corners with the build quality. Much of the lens barrel is finished in Sigmas matt powder coated finish, which looks very smart when new, but seems to show up marks a little easier than some other lens finishes. I use it for action sports shooting, almost all of it outdoors during daylight hours, including yacht racing, and occasionally for large artificially-lighted stadium events, such as baseball and Super-cross motorcycle racing. Shooting in such light is not a problem with the higher ISO capabilities of the D3, D700 and D7100. I also had the 120-400, which was really nice in the wide end, and, according to the lens engineer that serviced my lens, sharper than the 150-500, but I got more hits with the 150-500 @ 400 than I ever got with the 120-400 that's for sure. Yes it DOES focus at F6.3 and 500mm and yes it will focus on a moving object but only until it gets to about 25-20 metres but after this it gives up every time. Have used the lens for some wildlife and sports photography. Been using lens on canon mark III and the results are very good. Was able to compare pictures with a canon 500 f4 used on the same wildlife outing and found the images to be comparable in sharpness and tone but a bit off in color compared to canon. It is much lighter and portable than the canon and has the advantage of zoom. I am happy with it and would buy it again. I enjoy wildlife and sports photography but have never considered spending all the money it would take to get the canon lense. This one is great and i think you would have to do some very close scrutiny to tell the difference in the photograph produced.Following the advice of SLR Gear reviewers it is used mainly at f8 and with as high a shutter speed as I can obtain and still keep the ISO sensitivity reasonably low. This is quite an astonishing performance for a zoom: even wide open the results are very good at the center, the DX-corner, and the FX-corner. Remember that we are looking with a 36MP sensor at the performance of this lens. So this is an excellent result! It all comes down to your specific shooting requirements. Some folks who focus mainly on sports photography may find that a camera like the D500 is a better choice for their needs. For example, the AF-C frame rate on a D750 is 6.5 frames per second, while the D500 shoots at 10 frames per second. The buffer on a D750 is 48 images compared to 200 with the D500. So, if you plan on shooting in AF-C mode the D500 would outperform the D750 on that particular dimension. If you shoot in low light much of the time then a full frame camera is likely better for your needs. Shooting with a cropped sensor camera also would give you a 1.5X crop factor. These are only a few of the many considerations that could enter into your decision.

Sigma 150-500mm f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM for Nikon Digital and Sigma 150-500mm f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM for Nikon Digital and

Optically, it isn't a bad performer either, especially at the shorter end of the zoom. Unfortunately at 500mm, which is what I feel a lens like this is all about, the results are noticeably softer and the level of colour aberrations may become an issue. Still, for the price if you can live with these flaws this lens could represent excellent value for money. When set to maximum zoom (nominally 500mm) I measured the actual focal length of the Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM set to be around 480mm focused at infinity and around 450mm focused at 10 m (about 30 ft). At the closest possible focus (~2.2 m), magnification is around 0.2x, which implies a focal length of roughly 300mm. None of these numbers are out of the ordinary for a lens of this type. Open aperture performance of the Pentax at 300mm is impressive (and well ahead of the Sigma at the same setting), but both suffer loss of sharpness in the outer field. All lenses in this comparison cover full frame sensors or can equally be used on a cropped APS-C camera body. [+] I was angry last month when Sigma anounce 50-500 OS but I must ignore it because is double the price of my 150-500 OS. But I'm sure this 50-500 OS is perfect for all the fases in sport, nearly and far.

Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Specifications

I was using a Nikon D7000 for part of my hands-on test and I was able to get a number of usable images of swallows in flight with it when using the Sigma 150-500mm OS. This was something I didn’t even bother trying with the Tamron when shooting with a D7000 due to focus lag. I also tried a number of AF-C bursts with the D7000 and got good results with the Sigma, filling up the D7000’s buffer on numerous occasions with well-focused sequential shots. NIKON D800 @ 300mm, ISO 1600, 1/2500, f/6.0 With these three lenses Sigma has covered many bases in its long zoom offerings. So people looking for something to complement their kit lenses or moderate tele-zooms will almost certainly have one of Sigma’s zooms on their short-list. As all three offer optical stabilization the choice comes down to maximum focal length and zoom-range. The 50-500mm seems to be the logical choice here as it covers the greatest range. But it also is the most expensive of all three, and a 10x super-zoom represents a much greater challenge for optical construction than the moderate 3.3x zooms covering 120-400mm or 150-500mm. That makes the 150-500mm the best choice for people wanting the longest reach at the most affordable price. Whether Sigma was able to come up with a well performing zoom within these design parameters is subject of my review. To really put this super-telephoto zoom through its paces I got hold of the F-mount version and tested it on a 36 Megapixel full-frame Nikon D800. Read on to discover how it performed.

Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM - Nikon Fit

From Sigma lens literature) The Sigma Corporation is pleased to announce the launch of the new APO 150-500mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM. An ultra-telephoto zoom lens covering a telephoto range up to 500mm, incorporating Sigma's original OS (Optical Stabilizer) function.Vignetting is observed with the Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM, especially when the lens is used with a full frame DSLR, wide open or at 500mm. The images below show the extent of corner darkening when shooting with a full frame camera I shoot this equally on a D300S and D7000, favouring the D7000 in low light conditions. I think the user should consider the following before buying, not only this lens, but anything in this focal length, especailly on a non-FX sized sensor. How good is your technique hand held ? If you currently struggle with a 200 or 300mm then think again unless you happy to lug about and set up a tripod for each shot, factor this by at what ISO your camera body will produce acceptable output. I have just won a local competition with an image grabbed at 500mm on my D7000 handheld. What follows are near-center results (first column) followed by DX-corner results and FX-corner results on a D800. The D800 results from the DX-corner should be a very good approximation for performance on a 16MP DX sensor (like the D7000), because the pixel-pitch of both sensors are the same. But differences in the AA-filter and micro-lens-design of a D800 and a D7000 might yield different end-results. I ended up with a Nikon 80-400 and did some comparisons. Wide open at 400mm the Sigma matched or beat the Nikon in sharpness - though the balance tips as you step down. IMO, this lens is a better value than the current version of the Nikon 80-400. Longer reach, faster AF and 2/3 the price. Good center performance can now only be achieved at f8 but the corners (at DX especially) are suffering from some light-bleeding. And even if you stop down further neither the DX-corner nor the FX-corner achieve good definition. BTW. the deterioration in image quality at f11 from the center into the corners can also be seen at 66% or 50% magnification. So even on a D4 or a D700 the weak corners will show.