So two types of English is being written all over the world. One is with appropriate words and quite easy to understand but has some grammatical errors while other one is greatly free from grammar errors but not much fluent because of its thoughts being translated from the first language of its thinker.

It’s all about developing a listening ear with regard to your own writing. And about keeping things clear and simple for your readers. Dangling Modifiers Punctuation gradually evolved in different forms across cultures as a way of helping people figure out where to pause, and for how long, when reading out loud. The problem was, everyone did it differently, This was understandable when all writing was done by hand, but once movable type was invented the need for standardized punctuation became clear. In fact, the best general rule of thumb for commas overall is that there is no general rule of thumb. Even the old grammar guide that says to “use a comma wherever you would pause in speaking” is misleading, because we all speak so differently. (Imagine where the commas would fall, for example, in Morgan Freeman’s speech as opposed to Christopher Walken’s!) So when it comes to your blog, know which way is correct, but don’t be afraid to bend the rules a bit here for the sake of sounding more conversational. Who vs. That One way of avoiding them is to read your posts out loud as part of your editing process. If you find yourself literally running out of breath before running out of sentence, look for ways to break the run-on sentence into more than one.

Learning outcomes

Would you really consider shortchanging your permanent global brand by skipping the perfect .Com and letting someone else dominate online forever, and potentially offline? That would be a very costly mistake for your family's future and for the other stakeholders of your entity; everyone similarly situated regrets it.

Abbreviations are useful (and sometimes colorful) devices for shortening common words and phrases, but using them correctly can be a bit confusing. Yes, there are subcategories, exceptions, and sometimes even controversies about the parts of speech (you ain’t seen nothin’ until you’ve seen grammarians duking it out over the finer points of language), but for our purposes we’re going to keep this simple. Nouns Apparently, I’m old-fashioned in believing that people are people, not things. But for the record, it is now apparently permissible to refer to people as either “the folks who” or “the folks that.” (Ew.)Whether this response is conscious or unconscious, that is not the feeling you want your readers to have.